Video: Hoe zullen de resultaten van SEAM-RA de praktijk beïnvloeden?

Delen via:

In deze video bespreekt Peter Taylor (University of Oxford, VK) hoe de resultaten van de SEAM-RA-studie de richtlijnen voor de behandeling van reumatoïde artritis kunnen beïnvloeden, en welke vragen voor toekomstig onderzoek hieruit naar voren komen.

  • Transcript

    One of the recommendations that crops up in both the current American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis and in the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis is that if our patients are on an advance therapy and are in remission that we might consider tapering down the dose. And this, of course, is very appealing when it comes to cost effectiveness of drugs. But on the other hand, there’s really relatively little evidence about how to do this in a way which ensures ongoing benefit for patients. And so the SEAM-RA study actually set out to address this problem. And it did it in a very interesting and robust way, because it was a study that was based on patients recruited who were on etanercept, the standard dose of 50 milligrams by subcutaneous injection once weekly, in combination with methotrexate at a varying dose between 10 and 25 milligrams orally once a week. And it asked the question, can you actually maintain a remission, if you’ve had remission for some time, by either withdrawing the etanercept or by withdrawing the methotrexate? But what was particularly pleasing about the design of this particular study is that the remission not only had to be maintained for up to six months, but it had to be a deep remission. So this was a remission by a metric called the SDAI, which is a fairly stringent measure of remission. And I think that’s important because had they chosen DAS28-CRP, which is a much less stringent measure of remission, then perhaps we would have had rather less confidence in the findings. What happened with this particular study was that after randomizing patients who had maintained remission by SDAI for some time, they were then randomized into one of three arms, either withdrawal of the methotrexate, withdrawal of the etanercept, or continuing on etanercept plus methotrexate, and it was a 2:2:1 randomization, with the smaller number on the combination therapy. And the patients were then followed for 48 weeks, and the primary endpoint was actually SDAI remission, which is a remission of 3.3 or less, and that’s what they were looking at. And then they looked for any time for loss of remission. And what the findings were were as follows, that firstly, and perhaps somewhat disappointingly, on the combination arm, only just over half the patients actually maintained this SDAI remission at 48 weeks. So in fact, 53%, more or less, maintained the remission if they were on the combination arm. But more pleasingly, the etanercept monotherapy patients had a very similar number, with 49 and 1/2% of patients maintaining remission. And this was statistically significantly higher than the proportion who maintained it on methotrexate, which was just under 29%. So one could say that what this study showed is that if you withdraw methotrexate that you’ve got a fairly similar chance of maintaining remission if you’re on etanercept monotherapy as if you’re on combination therapy. And given that one of the major problems of concomitant methotrexate is that it’s not always terribly well-tolerated– in fact, many patients stop taking their methotrexate because it’s not well-tolerated, and they may not even tell their physician that that’s the case. It’s estimated that a 1/3 or more of patients stop their methotrexate– then from that point of view, this is actually a very useful result to have. The other aspects of the results here were, as I say, rather disappointing, a large proportion of patients lost their remission state. And that happened gradually over time over a period of about six months or more. But for those patients who lost their remission state, it turned out that it could be regained fairly straightforwardly, and particularly if the patients went back on to combination therapy with etanercept and methotrexate, in which case about 80% of patients would eventually regain remission. And in fact, 100% of patients regained a low-disease activity state over the course of something like 24 to 44 weeks. So what impact might these results have on guidelines? Well, I think they’re very informative because what they might suggest is that firstly, if you’re going to consider tapering medication for patients that are doing relatively well on treatments, firstly, you want to know that they’re in a robust remission state. And I think that means that they have, at the very least, to be in a DAS28-CRP remission, but ideally in a deeper remission, so perhaps a DAS28-ESR, or an SDAI, or CDAI would be preferable. And most probably, you’d need to be in a remission state for at least six months. And then if you’re going to move to a single therapy rather than a combination, then it would be preferable to move to etanercept as a monotherapy is what this particular set of results would imply. But we can perhaps assume that similar findings might also be the case if one were to use other anti-TNFs, but of course, that’s yet to be proven. The other issue that I would very much like to see coming into guidelines is that for those patients who maintain their remission state on a lower dose, then that’s obviously a very good outcome. But for those patients who lose their remission state, which is a very high proportion of patients, that they should be able to go back onto the original therapy with a view to a rescue program to regain the remission state. And I’d like to see that creeping in because in some health care economies, such as, for example, in the United Kingdom where I work, it is not necessarily the case that you’ll get the original regime reimbursed if you’ve once stopped it. Well, there are several potential limitations. So for example, in this study recruitment was allowed for patients who were taking low-dose prednisolone. And you could potentially say that was a limitation, because idealistically, if you’re going to think about reducing an advance therapy or reducing the concomitant methotrexate, you’d like to see that patients were off steroid treatment first. But in actual fact, it turned out that across the randomization arms in this study, there were very few patients, indeed, on prednisolone, and so I think the investigators are to be commended for that. With respect to other limitations, of course, we only have results for one particular anti-TNF, namely, etanercept, and it’s not absolutely clear that these results would pertain with other anti-TNFs. And there are four other originators and, of course, many biosimilars now, but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to assume that there might be similar data if other anti-TNFs were involved in a trial design such as this. There are numerous opportunities for research that might emerge from this trial. I don’t believe the analyses have been done yet based on the presentation we heard at the American College of Rheumatology meeting. But one of the key questions is, are there predictors of those patients who will attain and maintain a remission status? And that’s really a very critical question. The other research question that I think is very important is for those patients who lose their remission status, in other words they flare to some extent, the data suggests that it may take quite a bit of time for them to regain remission status when they go back onto the original therapy or have reintroduction of etanercept as a monotherapy. And of course, this has implications, because it means the time-integrated inflammation that the patient’s exposed to could potentially result in structural damage or even functional loss. So we need to see the post hoc analysis data to understand whether there are any detrimental effects of allowing a patient to flare and then retreating with a view to gaining remission. And we need to know about predictors of either maintained remission or predictors of loss of remission. And of course, that would inform clinical practice.

Lees ook in ons ACR-congresdossier: Behoud van remissie beter bij continueren etanercept

Provided by Medicine Matters rheumatology; ©2020 Springer Healthcare Ltd, part of the Springer Nature Group.

TNFα-remmers reduceren botverlies bij RA onafhankelijk van klinische respons

jan 2021 |

Lees meer over TNFα-remmers reduceren botverlies bij RA onafhankelijk van klinische respons

Associatie tussen meniscusvolume en ontwikkeling van knieartrose

jan 2021 |

Lees meer over Associatie tussen meniscusvolume en ontwikkeling van knieartrose

Herkenning van artritis in tijden van telemedicine

jan 2021 |

Lees meer over Herkenning van artritis in tijden van telemedicine

ILD: longartsen en reumatologen leren van elkaars expertise

jan 2021 |

Lees meer over ILD: longartsen en reumatologen leren van elkaars expertise

Interferon-induceerbare proteïnescore voorspelt respons bij SSc-ILD

dec 2020 |

Lees meer over Interferon-induceerbare proteïnescore voorspelt respons bij SSc-ILD

Promotie: Oplossing voor chronische pijn dichterbij

dec 2020 |

Lees meer over Promotie: Oplossing voor chronische pijn dichterbij

Webinars ‘Op de hoogte blijven van medicamenteuse behandeling van reumatische ziekten’

6 jan 2021 | Dermatologie

Lees meer over Webinars ‘Op de hoogte blijven van medicamenteuse behandeling van reumatische ziekten’

Terugkerende koortssyndromen: steeds beter te (be)grijpen en behandelen

15 dec 2020 | Overig

Lees meer over Terugkerende koortssyndromen: steeds beter te (be)grijpen en behandelen

EULAR-ACR in ORANJE

17 nov 2020 | Reumatologie

Lees meer over EULAR-ACR in ORANJE

Webcast Update Systemische Sclerose

12 nov 2020 | Cardiologie

Lees meer over Webcast Update Systemische Sclerose

Precisiezorg dichterbij dan we denken

2 nov 2020 | Cardiologie

Lees meer over Precisiezorg dichterbij dan we denken

Make it Happen: someday starts today

2 nov 2020 om 17:00 | Reumatologie

Lees meer over Make it Happen: someday starts today

Mannen vs vrouwen met spondyloartritis (SpA): de verschillen in diagnose, beloop en mogelijke implicaties voor de behandeling

15 okt 2020 om 20:30 | Reumatologie

Lees meer over Mannen vs vrouwen met spondyloartritis (SpA): de verschillen in diagnose, beloop en mogelijke implicaties voor de behandeling

Nieuwe EULAR richtlijnen

4 jun 2020 om 19:30 | Reumatologie

Lees meer over Nieuwe EULAR richtlijnen

Op de Bres voor Reumatologie | 4 video’s over het beschikbaar maken van innovatie binnen de reumatologie

1 jun 2020 om 19:00 | Reumatologie

Lees meer over Op de Bres voor Reumatologie | 4 video’s over het beschikbaar maken van innovatie binnen de reumatologie

Osteoporosis – VERO subgroup analyses results

Reumatologie

Lees meer over Osteoporosis – VERO subgroup analyses results
Er zijn geen bijeenkomsten gevonden.

Kunstmatige intelligentie bruikbaar voor detectie van radiografische sacro-iliitis bij axiale SpA

Lees meer
Lees meer over Kunstmatige intelligentie bruikbaar voor detectie van radiografische sacro-iliitis bij axiale SpA

Tofacitinib effectief bij ziekte van Bechterew

Lees meer
Lees meer over Tofacitinib effectief bij ziekte van Bechterew

Langdurig verhoogd risico op hartaandoeningen bij kinderen met ziekte van Kawasaki

Lees meer
Lees meer over Langdurig verhoogd risico op hartaandoeningen bij kinderen met ziekte van Kawasaki

Nieuwe Amerikaanse RA-richtlijn pleit voor maximaliseren methotrexaat

Lees meer
Lees meer over Nieuwe Amerikaanse RA-richtlijn pleit voor maximaliseren methotrexaat

Positief effect nintedanib bij patiënten met progressieve fibroserende ILD

Lees meer
Lees meer over Positief effect nintedanib bij patiënten met progressieve fibroserende ILD

Toevoegen belimumab succesvol bij lupusnefritis

Lees meer
Lees meer over Toevoegen belimumab succesvol bij lupusnefritis

Filgotinib vermindert inflammatie bij ziekte van Bechterew

Lees meer
Lees meer over Filgotinib vermindert inflammatie bij ziekte van Bechterew

Denosumab effectiever dan bisfosfonaten bij langdurig glucocorticoïdgebruik

Lees meer
Lees meer over Denosumab effectiever dan bisfosfonaten bij langdurig glucocorticoïdgebruik

Verbeterde kwaliteit van leven met tofacitinib vooral door minder jeuk

Lees meer
Lees meer over Verbeterde kwaliteit van leven met tofacitinib vooral door minder jeuk

De voor- en nadelen van zorg op afstand: ervaringen van Nederlandse reumatologen tijdens COVID

nov 2020 |

Lees meer over De voor- en nadelen van zorg op afstand: ervaringen van Nederlandse reumatologen tijdens COVID

Podcast - Terugkerende koortssyndromen: steeds beter te (be)grijpen en behandelen

okt 2020 |

Lees meer over Podcast - Terugkerende koortssyndromen: steeds beter te (be)grijpen en behandelen

De ACR-adviezen voor reumatologische zorg tijdens de COVID-19-pandemie nader bekeken

aug 2020 |

Lees meer over De ACR-adviezen voor reumatologische zorg tijdens de COVID-19-pandemie nader bekeken